jueves, 26 de mayo de 2016
miércoles, 25 de mayo de 2016
OP#2: Video task
The goal of teaching strategies
in the classroom is to create autonomous learners, who can learn by themselves
in and outside school. To facilitate learning for students of all ages there
are many language learning strategies to consider. Successful learners, in
general, tend to select strategies that work for them depending on the
requirements of the task. These learners can certainly tell what strategies
they use and why they work so well for them instead of others. Nevertheless,
what happens with those students who do not have the capacity to select
strategies and apply those which are effective for them?
In this particular case
the teacher must be the one offering and teaching different strategies for the
different types of learners there might be in a classroom. In the video, the teacher
offers a wide range of strategies for students to pick the one that best suits
them. Undoubtedly, any type of strategy showed in class must be a reflection of
the students’ needs, challenges and strengths. For this reason she uses
language specific skills such as knowing how to use English in any area
(speaking, reading, writing, and listening); then, cognition and meta-cognition
is reflected in the schema-activation, the transfer of knowledge, self-reflection.
Affective factors are surely a key factor since we are dealing with motivation,
confidence and a trusting atmosphere which can encourage learners’
participation and risk-taking in the class.
If I had to transfer some
of the strategies showed in the video to my groups of learners, I would say
that all are very useful. In my case, I have all range of ages (from young
learners to adults). Thus, if I had to select the most effective ones for some
specific groups and ages, I think I would definitely use transfer of knowledge,
teaching to others, schema-activation and self-reflection. For instance,
teaching to others could be effective if those high-level students could teach
the weak ones in the class, just by giving them a hand on certain aspects of
grammar or structures in writing. This way both the strong and the weak student
would improve some of the weakest aspects.
With young learners
schema-activation is quite significant because going from what they already
know to the unknown makes a great impact on their learning process, while being
unnoticed sometimes. For adolescents and young adults self-reflection
strategies are also great because they can develop their autonomous and
reflective skills, which are meaningful for adult lives. By transferring part of
their knowledge they can also see or identify patterns of grammar as well.
Needless to say, the
teacher should always provide affective strategies as well. Motivation and
giving them the confidence to keep working and improving should be always
present in the class in any task. By doing this we create a trusting atmosphere
which encourage them to takes risks and to participate actively and
communicatively.
jueves, 19 de mayo de 2016
Grid Concepts
|
Concept
|
Definition
|
Source
|
|
Translanguaging
|
The use of two languages in the classroom as “the
linguistic resources of the child to maximise understanding and achievement.
Both languages are used in a dynamic and integrated manner”. It is an
intentional and planned two-language usage. It is flexible and enables
learning through more than one language.
|
Lewis, Gwyn; Jones, Bryn; Baker, Colin. 2012. “Translanguaging:
Developing its Conceptualisation and Contextualisation”. Educational Research and Evaluation: and International Journal on
Theory and Practice, Vol. 18:7, 655.
|
|
Diglossia
|
The different uses and functions that two languages
receive by a bilingual speaker.
|
Lewis, Gwyn; Jones, Bryn; Baker, Colin. 2012. “Translanguaging:
Developing its Conceptualisation and Contextualisation”. Educational Research and Evaluation: and International Journal on
Theory and Practice, Vol. 18:7, 656
|
|
Code-switching
|
It is a bilingual mode in which both L1 and L2 are
used simultaneously. It is a creative strategy by the speaker and sometimes a
scaffolding technique in bilingual classrooms. It has associations with
language separation.
|
Lewis, Gwyn; Jones, Bryn; Baker, Colin. 2012. “Translanguaging:
Developing its Conceptualisation and Contextualisation”. Educational Research and Evaluation: and International Journal on
Theory and Practice, Vol. 18:7, 657-658
|
|
Monolingual
|
Non-bilingual speaker
|
Swain, Merrill; Kirkpatrick, Andy; Cummins, Jim. 2001.
“How to have a Guilt-Free Life using Cantonese in the English Class”. A Handbook for the English Language
Teacher in Hong Kong, Vol (?), 3
|
|
Lingua franca
|
English as such refers to the “common language of
communication by bilingual and multilingual people for whom English is not a
first language. The great majority of communication in English is between
people who come from non-English backgrounds”.
|
Swain, Merrill; Kirkpatrick, Andy; Cummins, Jim.
2001. “How to have a Guilt-Free Life using Cantonese in the English Class”. A Handbook for the English Language
Teacher in Hong Kong, Vol (?), 7
|
|
Cross-linguistic
|
Term to describe the way two different language systems
interact in the mind of a speaker or learner so as to understand better the
patterns or rules by comparing and contrasting.
|
Swain, Merrill; Kirkpatrick, Andy; Cummins, Jim.
2001. “How to have a Guilt-Free Life using Cantonese in the English Class”. A Handbook for the English Language
Teacher in Hong Kong, Vol (?), 12
|
|
Strategy
|
Sometimes associated with the terms “techniques”,
“tactics” or “learning behaviours”. It is basically the techniques or tools
which a learner might use to acquire or understand new content. They can be
classified into 6 categories: memory
strategies, cognitive strategies, compensation strategies, metacognitive
strategies, affective strategies, and social strategies.
|
Griffiths, Carol. 2004. Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Vol (?), 1-4
|
|
Interlanguage
|
“The intermediate system created while the learner
is trying to come to terms with the target language […] errors as evidence of
positive efforts by the student to learn the new language.”
|
Griffiths, Carol. 2004. Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Vol (?), 7
|
|
Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis
|
It is what Krashen coined for the conscious learning
to develop a language (ineffectively).
|
Griffiths, Carol. 2004. Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Vol (?), 8
|
|
Natural Order Hypothesis
|
This idea states that learning stages or features of
a language have a natural order for a student to acquire them.
|
Griffiths, Carol. 2004. Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Vol (?), 8
|
|
The Monitor Hypothesis
|
In plain words, it is what we call when the system
learnt monitors or edits the output of the learner of the previously acquired
system.
|
Griffiths, Carol. 2004. Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Vol (?), 8
|
|
The Input Hypothesis
|
“language is acquired by understanding input which
is a little beyond the current level of competence or comprehensible input”.
|
Griffiths, Carol. 2004. Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Vol (?), 8
|
|
Affective Filter Hypothesis
|
“a learner’s emotions and attitudes can act as a
filter which slows down the acquisition of language. When the affective is
high it can block language development”.
|
Griffiths, Carol. 2004. Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Vol (?), 8
|
|
Communicative Competence
|
It is the ability or skill that a speaker has to use
language in order to deliver and interpret messages and pieces of
information.
|
Griffiths, Carol. 2004. Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Vol (?), 9
|
miércoles, 18 de mayo de 2016
Self-reflection on Strategies
While watching the videos
I realised that nothing is impossible if you have enough motivation and if you
find your strategy to achieve your goal. It is impressive that a teenager is
able to speak 15 languages; I even think just 5 or 6 are impressive, too. The question
lays on what strategies to use and how someone can find them out.
I remember when I was a
kid and I had to study a unit for history class. Teachers had always taught us
to underline everything we found important. My problem was that I found
everything to be important. So, I underlined almost everything with my pencil
and my ruler. However, my problem was what to do once I had everything marked. How
would an 8-year-old girl study or learn something so as to remember the day of
the exam? And I say remember because that is what they taught us, to remember
and to “vomit”. Would not it be better to make students understand things? To teach
them a great range of strategies so as to let them choose what best suits them?
I think this way we would be half-way on the right track. It would definitely
reduce the number of drop-outs in schooling. If teachers, parents, educators
and governments offered different ways of learning about things, there would
not be such an amount of frustrated and demotivated kids who lose their
interest on education.
Strategies should be
something taught at school, as another subject on the curriculum. They should
be aware of the possibilities they have to learn about anything: history,
maths, cultures, art and so on. Due to the mixed-abilities classrooms we face
it is imperative to have our students motivated and interested by showing to
them that there is not just one way of doing things, they just have to find
their own way. Students should be taught in terms of social-affective
strategies for instance. We must not have young learners who seem to have lost
their path in education because they just “do not fit” in the system. Certainly
what they need is the system to be adapted to them.
First questions - Introduction
1. What is a strategy?
If we interpret a “strategy” from the point of
view of a learner, I would say that it refers to all the activities the student
does so as to acquire knowledge or understand new content. However, if we talk
from a teacher’s perspective, I think it has to do with the activities or
methodologies they use to get their students successfully into a task.
2. What are strategies
mainly used for?
They are tools that learners and teacher have
that they know will work effectively and will help them to achieve a goal, for
instance to learn new vocabulary or to motivate students into a reading task.
3. Do you use any
language learning strategies? If so, which ones?
As a student I used to read page by page of a
unit and then I would write a summary with the main information, or if the unit
was not so thick I used to create a mind-map. Sometimes it was very helpful to
explain others what I had learnt, for example my parents or my own classmates. This
way I made sure that I had understood and embraced what I had read.
4. What language
teaching strategies are you familiar with?
I do not really remember the name of any but I
guess that each teacher has its own “tricks” or techniques for a class. For
example, in my case I have students who never remember that “people” is plural
and so they always write “people is”. I once told them that they could
associate the sound of “bipolar” in Spanish to remember “people are”.
5. Are the kinds of
strategies mentioned above different from communication strategies? If so, in
what ways?
I think there is a difference between
communication and language teaching/learning strategies. Communicative strategies
are based on getting someone’s message across, for instance using gestures or
faces to achieve it.
jueves, 31 de marzo de 2016
Scaffolding
SCAFFOLDING READING
EXPERIENCES FOR MULTILINGUAL CLASSROOMS (SRE)
by
Michael F. Graves and Jill Fitzgerald
Chapter 5
The article starts by stating that thousands of
teachers in the US and other countries teach in classes where students have
different language background, language skills, and different reading
proficiency. We find this diversity even more when we teach a multilingual
class. The approach described in the
article addresses only to one aspect of reading instruction. What is important
is for children to have a successful reading experience. According to Graves
and Fitzgerald “it is important that children understand what they read, enjoy
the experience of reading, learn from what they read” (2002:96)*.
In this particular chapter, it is discussed one
approach to assisting students in multilingual classrooms to read, understand,
learn from and enjoy, that is, the scaffolding experience. This term was first
used by Wood, Bruner, and Ros (1976) to characterise mothers’ verbal
interaction when reading to their young children. It basically consists of a process that
enables the child to solve a problem or task, or even achieve a goal, which
could be beyond his/her capability. Of course, it is a temporary support which
enables the accomplishment of a task.
There are 3 attributes which are highly related
to the scaffolding technique:
- The scaffold itself: the temporary and supportive structure.
- Vygotsky’s term (1978): Zone of Proximal Development.
- Teachers must gradually dismantle their support and transfer the responsibility to complete tasks to the student. It is through this gradual process that students become more competent and independent learners.
In the SRE framework we find 4 main factors to bear
in mind: the characteristics of the learner, the nature of the materials, the
learning activities, and the criterial tasks. We also find two different phases
– the planning and the implementation –. The planning phase consists of the
creation of a particular situation with a particular reading experience. It must
take into account the students, the reading selection, and the reading purpose.
The implementation phase compiles a set
of pre-reading, during-reading, and post-reading activities. The pre-reading
tasks serve to get students interested in the topic, to remind them of
things they already know, or basically pre-teaching new content, such as
vocabulary or expressions. These activities are really important, especially
for those whose L1 is not English and might not be familiar with certain
topics. The during-activities serve to make them focus on particular
pieces of information. And finally, the post-activities they provide opportunities
for students to synthesize and organize information learned from reading a text
and to recall and understand important details.
Here we find a list with possible activities
for each group:
As a conclusion, scaffolding is a kind of
lesson plan that relies heavily on the concept of scaffolding –having a temporary,
supportive figure in the learning process –. The reading experience must be
successful and rewarding. The goal of scaffolding is for students to become
independent and lifelong readers.
*Graves, M. F., & Fitzgerald, J. (2002). Scaffolding Reading
Experiences for Multilingual Classrooms. In Garcia, G. G. (Ed.), English Learners: Reaching the Highest Level
of English Literacy (pp. 96-104). Newark: International Reading Association.
miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2016
COMPULSORY TASK #1: Exploring my reading experience: learner and teacher
When I was at high school
reading adapted short books was basically part of the evaluation. Students were
required to read them in order to have a final quiz where they would be asked
about the content. Back then I imagined they did it because they wanted to
check how good we were in reading comprehension and in producing such answers. Of
course, given the fact that this was not a voluntary task, most people did not
get to finish the book or even get started. They found the task to be quite
boring and meaningless.
Personally, I did not
find the activity to be that boring, quite the opposite. I realised that I
understood more words and expressions than I expected, and that I learned loads
of vocabulary. Perhaps the challenging part was that of producing my own
answers in the quiz.
Now, as a teacher, I do
not use any adapted novels. I incorporate the reading competence into class by
having an activity behind. That is, if my students are about to face a reading
activity, there must be a meaningful task waiting for them after that. For instance,
let’s take a class of 8-9-year-old students. Imagine that they are reading
something on tigers. In this reading they have information such as, where they
live, what qualities they have (fast, dangerous…), physical appearance (big
tail, sharp teeth…), and what they feed from.
If the reading has a
catchy title or a nice picture, I tend to introduce first the topic by asking
them what they can see in the picture or what the story could be about just by
reading the title. We will try to read paragraph by paragraph and I will make
them questions just to check if they followed without problems. Meanwhile they
should have underlined those words new for them, which will be later explained.
The idea is that the
reading leads to the main task, which could be a mini project on their
favourite animal. They should write about one animal they like and should include,
more or less, the content they have seen in the previous reading. Obviously,
the task must be realistic, meaning that we should plan an activity which can
be fulfilled by a 9-year-old student without big difficulties. As an
alternative, we could have our students presenting their project to the rest of
the class, once they have produced the text where they expose their
information.
Honestly, I have never
thought of reading comprehension being an innovative strategy for teaching EFL.
However, I do think that it is a competence that must be trained no matter
what. There is a big difference reading by pleasure and reading with a language
purpose. I guess the challenge is to conceal them both in the same objective.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)



